What, exactly, poses the most danger to the United States in this day and time? Last week, I had a moment where the ideas of two remarkable people melded in my mind and formed the answer I’d been seeking. I was halfway there in a vague way, and have articulated it in bits and pieces, but what I heard last week allows me to say what I mean more clearly.
First, if you think the greatest danger facing the U.S. is terrorism, your focus is in the wrong place. Let me give you an analogy. Two and a half years ago, I came down with appendicitis, and had to have an appendectomy in the middle of the night. Once that ordeal was over, I had a thoroughly inexplicable (at least to me) pain in my left shoulder that was almost equal to the pain of the appendicitis. I went to a neurologist. He said, you have an inflammation of the brachial plexus nerve in your shoulder. Understand, he said, this is not a diagnosis; it’s a condition, in other words, a symptom. We can help you with the pain temporarily by treating the symptom, but to cure you we have to find out and treat the cause. I need not beat anyone over the head by pointing out the similarities to our approach as a nation to terrorism.
One of the two people I refer to is Thomas Friedman, the foreign affairs columnist for the New York Times. For as long as I’ve been aware of him, his columns have said that the biggest problem we face is our addiction to oil, and our failure to take steps to reduce that addiction or create a viable energy policy. We have contributed to the rise of what he calls petro-dictatorships, and find ourselves going to the Saudis, hat in hand, begging for lower oil prices, which failed. This week I heard an interview with him on NPR, promoting his new book Hot, Flat, and Crowded. For more about Friedman and his credentials, see his website http://www.thomaslfriedman.com/
What sealed the deal for me, however, was the interview on NPR with Andrew J. Bacevich, a guy I’d never even heard of. He was promoting his new book The Limits of Power: The End of American Exceptionalism. Bacevich is a professor of history and international relations at Boston University. Since we’re constantly exhorted to listen to the people who “know” and have “been there”, Bacevich is a 20-year veteran of the Army who fought in Vietnam and retired as a colonel. Last year, his son was killed by an IED in Iraq. He makes the point that Congress has abdicated its responsibility; we have created an “imperial presidency” and the military is the arm of that imperial presidency. We have no foreign policy per se. Most importantly, we aren’t paying for our wars. We’re borrowing for them. He said (and I hope I have these numbers right), the U.S. is 10 trillion dollars in debt on a 13 trillion dollar GDP. Because of this borrowing, he said, the American people have never fully realized the cost both in dollars and human terms of the war. There has been no sacrifice.
I’ve often thought that myself, walking down the aisle of the grocery store it sometimes hits me that there is no shortage of food and other goods. The only time I’m ever confronted with the reality of the war is when I’ve been in an airport and encountered soldiers in their desert camoflage. I believe that’s deliberate. Our “leaders” would rather borrow to conduct the war than ask the American people to sacrifice. Because if they did, the American people would probably have put a stop to it much sooner. Then a more critical eye might have been turned to the causes and conduct of the war.
We are a nation on the verge of collapse. No one is minding the store. Yet to suggest that is equivalent in many circles to being at best, unpatriotic, and at worst, a traitor. On a blog I read this morning, the blogger had a quote from C.S. Lewis, which went something like this: We all like progress, but when you find you’re on the wrong road, the only thing to do is turn back and take another road. Therefore, the person who turns back first is the smartest.
Taking all that into account, here’s what I think is the greatest problem facing the U.S. It’s anti-intellectualism. Just the mention of NPR or the New York Times causes a whole host of people to immediately dismiss whatever was said, by whoever said it. I blame that on the pathetic state of education in our country.
That’s why we can have a serious debate about pigs and lipstick. It’s why we can seriously want a ticket where the veep choice is a “hockey mom”, somebody just like us. My neighbor is a used car salesman and a really nice guy, but would I want him to be the President or the Vice President just because he’s a lot like me? I think not.
I leave you with a quote from Thomas Friedman’s NY Times op-ed piece entitled “The New Cold War”, published on May 14, 2008. He is referring to the fact that Iran is in fact a great danger, but the U.S. no longer has any leverage to bargain with. He quotes an Israeli name Ehuud Yaari.
“Simply put,” noted Mr. Yaari, “Tehran has created a situation in which anyone who wants to attack its atomic facilities will have to take into account that this will lead to bitter fighting” on the Lebanese, Palestinian, Iraqi and Persian Gulf fronts. That is a sophisticated strategy of deterrence.
The Bush team, by contrast, in eight years has managed to put America in the unique position in the Middle East where it is “not liked, not feared and not respected,” writes Aaron David Miller, a former Mideast negotiator under both Republican and Democratic administrations, in his provocative new book on the peace process, titled “The Much Too Promised Land.”
“We stumbled for eight years under Bill Clinton over how to make peace in the Middle East, and then we stumbled for eight years under George Bush over how to make war there,” said Mr. Miller, and the result is “an America that is trapped in a region which it cannot fix and it cannot abandon.”
It’s time to start walking backwards down that road, shoring up strength as we go, getting back to where we have leverage. Beating our chests and talking about how we are the greatest nation in the world won’t help, as China, India, and yes, even Russia emerge as the new super-powers.